Souvik
Souvik Author of SouvikG.com, a tech enthusiast and a kiddish Dad ! I love to tinker with my grey matter. You are currently previewing my journal, where i note down my figments of imagination

Compliance and Governance review

1. Regulatory Compliance

1.1 General Regulatory Compliance

  • Are all applicable industry standards and regulations (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, SOX) identified and documented?
  • Is there a compliance matrix mapping the system components to specific regulatory requirements?
  • Are compliance requirements integrated into the system design and development process?
  • Is there a process for regularly updating the system to comply with new or changing regulations?
  • Are there audit trails and logging mechanisms in place to track compliance activities?
  • Are data protection and privacy policies enforced throughout the system?

1.2 Data Privacy and Protection

  • Is personal data (PII) handled in accordance with relevant data protection regulations?
  • Are data minimization practices followed, collecting only the data necessary for processing?
  • Is there a clear data classification scheme, and are sensitive data adequately protected?
  • Are consent management and user rights (e.g., right to access, right to be forgotten) implemented?
  • Is data encryption applied both at rest and in transit?
  • Are there procedures for data breach notification and incident response?

1.3 Security Compliance

  • Are security standards (e.g., ISO 27001, NIST) applied consistently across the system?
  • Are access controls and authentication mechanisms aligned with regulatory requirements?
  • Are regular security audits, vulnerability assessments, and penetration tests conducted?
  • Are third-party vendors and services compliant with the relevant regulations?
  • Is there a security incident response plan in place, and is it regularly tested?

1.4 Data Retention and Disposal

  • Are data retention policies compliant with regulatory requirements?
  • Is there a documented data lifecycle management process?
  • Are data disposal and destruction processes secure and compliant?
  • Are there mechanisms to ensure that data is purged in accordance with retention policies?
  • Are legal hold processes in place for retaining data during litigation?

Questionnaire:

  • What are the specific regulatory requirements applicable to this system, and how are they addressed?
  • How is personal data handled to ensure compliance with data protection regulations?
  • What are the key challenges in maintaining compliance, and how are they mitigated?
  • How does the architecture support regular compliance audits and reporting?
  • How is regulatory change management handled within the architecture?
  • How are third-party services or vendors evaluated for compliance?

2. Governance

2.1 Architecture Documentation

  • Is there comprehensive and up-to-date documentation of the system architecture?
  • Are architectural decisions documented, including rationale, alternatives considered, and trade-offs made?
  • Is there a central repository for storing and managing architectural documentation?
  • Are documentation standards and templates followed across all projects?
  • Are architecture diagrams (e.g., component diagrams, data flow diagrams) maintained and regularly updated?
  • Is there a version control system in place for managing architectural artifacts?

2.2 Review Cycles and Decision-Making

  • Are regular architecture review meetings or boards established?
  • Are roles and responsibilities for architecture review clearly defined?
  • Is there a formal process for proposing, reviewing, and approving architectural changes?
  • Are architecture reviews conducted at key stages of the project lifecycle (e.g., design, pre-release)?
  • Are there criteria for evaluating architectural changes (e.g., impact analysis, risk assessment)?
  • Are decisions documented, and is there a process for revisiting decisions as needed?

2.3 Governance Processes

  • Are governance frameworks (e.g., TOGAF, COBIT) adopted and followed within the organization?
  • Is there a governance body or steering committee overseeing architecture practices?
  • Are there guidelines and policies for ensuring architectural alignment with business goals?
  • Are there metrics and KPIs to measure the effectiveness of architecture governance?
  • Is there a continuous improvement process for architecture governance practices?
  • Are there policies for managing technical debt, legacy systems, and architectural erosion?

2.4 Risk Management and Compliance Oversight

  • Are risk management practices integrated into the architecture review process?
  • Is there a process for identifying, assessing, and mitigating architectural risks?
  • Are there governance mechanisms for ensuring ongoing compliance with regulations?
  • Is there a process for monitoring and addressing non-compliance or governance issues?
  • Are risk assessments regularly reviewed and updated?
  • Are there escalation procedures for unresolved governance or compliance risks?

2.5 Stakeholder Involvement

  • Are stakeholders (e.g., business units, IT, legal, compliance) involved in architecture reviews?
  • Is there a process for gathering and incorporating stakeholder feedback into architectural decisions?
  • Are communication channels established to ensure transparency in decision-making?
  • Are stakeholders informed of architectural changes that impact their areas of responsibility?
  • Is there training or onboarding for new stakeholders involved in governance processes?

Questionnaire:

  • How is architectural documentation managed and maintained?
  • What are the key governance frameworks or models used in the organization?
  • How are architecture decisions made, documented, and communicated?
  • What is the process for conducting architecture reviews, and how often are they performed?
  • How are risks identified and managed within the architecture?
  • How does the governance process ensure alignment with business goals and regulatory requirements?
  • What metrics are used to evaluate the effectiveness of architecture governance?
  • How are stakeholders engaged in the architecture governance process?

comments powered by Disqus